You Are Worth More To Your Boss Dead Than Alive

Posted by Pile (17607 views) Add this story to MyYahoo Add this article to del.icio.us Submit article to Reddit Add story to Furl Add story to StumbleUpon [E-Mail link]

[Beating Dead Horses]
Did you know that if you work at Wal-Mart, the corporation will take out a secret life insurance policy on you, naming themselves as the beneficiary? It's called "Dead Peasant Insurance" and thousands of corporations do it. It seems that most employees are worth more dead, than alive to these companies and they gamble and speculate with the insurance industry to make money when their employees die.

Dead Peasant Insurance is sometimes used as a shorthand reference for life insurance policies that insure a company's rank-and-file employees and name the company as the beneficiary. This means that the company receives the life insurance benefits when the covered employees die. This insurance may also be called "janitor insurance," "corporate-owned life insurance," or "COLI."

How did it get the name "Dead Peasant" insurance?

Winn Dixie Stores bought life insurance policies on approximately 36,000 of its employees, without their knowledge or consent, and named itself as the policies? beneficiary. The insurance brokerage firm that placed the policies prepared two memos describing the deceased employees as "Dead Peasants." These memos were part of the court?s record in a lawsuit in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that Winn-Dixie's policies were a sham transaction for federal income tax purposes. The memos were later used by reporters such as Ellen Schultz and Theo Francis of the Wall Street Journal and L.M. Sixel of the Houston Chronicle and incorporated into articles about this type of insurance.

How does a person know if he or she is covered by a policy?

It is often difficult for a person to learn whether he or she was covered by a "Dead Peasant" policy. These insurance programs became popular during the mid-1980s and have been an available investment opportunity for large companies since that time. Prior to 2006, however, there was no federal law that required employers to disclose the policies to insured employees. Any disclosure requirements that existed before 2006 were only through state laws, which were ignored in many instances. So, the only way a person could learn about the policies was through the employer's voluntarily disclosure.

If this wasn't bad enough, Wal-Mart has been embroiled in litigation against insurance companies because they lost money trying to profit from the deaths of their "associates:"

"Discount retailing giant Wal-Mart cannot sue its insurers just because it gambled and lost $1.3 billion on getting a tax break from thousands of insurance policies it took out on employees, according to a brief filed by the insurers in the Delaware Supreme Court.

"Press reports have dubbed the 'corporate-owned life insurance' policies at issue in this litigation 'dead peasant insurance' because most of the policies were purchased by companies that employ large numbers of workers at the lower end of the wage scale and most of the policy benefits went to the companies rather than to families of deceased employees.

"Wal-Mart is contending in an appeal that it was entitled to rely on its expert insurance brokers to warn the company of the inherent dangers of buying COLI policies. Wal-Mart has asked the high court to revive its bad-faith and breach-of-duty claims against its insurers, which the Delaware Chancery Court had dismissed."

As of July 2005, six states had outlawed that practice in cases in which the employee is not told, Wikipedia reports. The online encyclopedia also states:

"Wal-Mart is one of those companies under fire from the US Internal Revenue Service and labor organizations for the practice. The IRS considers COLI a tax dodge, and has pursued Dow Chemical, Camelot Music, Winn-Dixie and American Electric Power, among others, to recover tax underpayments.

"The practice of using COLI is still widespread ... According to one source, Hartford Life Insurance estimated that one-quarter of all Fortune 500 companies have COLI policies, which cover the lives of about 5 million employees. Wal-Mart alone has policies on 350,000 employees."

Find out more information and which employers take out "Dead Peasant Insurance"

 

Posted by Anonymous on 2009-11-10 01:07:10
This article isn't true in any way. You can not take out a life insurance policy on a person without their knowledge and consent, as well as needing a full physical and access to medical documents.
Respond to Anoynymous below
Posted by Anonymous on 2009-11-14 06:06:49
Because corporations are always squeaky clean, right?
Posted by Anonymous on 2009-11-17 07:28:22
The article is entirely true. Companies in all industries take out dead peasant life insurance policies with themselves as the beneficiaries.
Bank of America, Boston Financial Data Services, and State Street Bank and Trust are but a few in the financial services industry.
Posted by Wal-MartPRDept on 2009-12-14 05:08:04
While we would never put somebody up to posting the first comment here, we of course can confirm that they are correct.

How's your Mother's middle name spelled?
Things aren't always what they seem..
Posted by Lawrence Jay Kramer on 2009-12-17 12:20:08
The last line of "Absence of Malice" comes to mind. The story is accurate, but it isn't true. The most important thing about Janitor COLI is that it was usually "experience rated," which is juat a technical way of saying that the insurance company and the employer had a deal whereby the premiums paid were pretty much equal to the claims paid. So the company made no money on employees' deaths. None. Zippo. So, yes, they insured them, sometimes without permission or knowlege, but they made no money on their deaths, so it's kinda hard to find something to be upset about.

No, the game was a tax arbitrage that worked only while the insured lived. As a result, the employer's interest was served by the employees' living longer, not by their dying. Not as convenient a truth as Michael Moore's version, but it is what it is, right?

As for the term "Dead Peasants," it did not refer to dead employees. It referred to former employees, and was an allusion to Gogol's "Dead Souls," in which a guy in feudal Russia bought the title to dead peasants because, thanks to slow census revisions, he could obtain loans against their future outputs even though they were dead. In janitor COLI, an employer could obtain loans to pay for policies on former employess, who were then analogized to the "dead peasants" in Gogol's story.

If you can find the memos (they were at Atty. Mike Myers web site last time I looked), you'll find no indication whatever that the term "Dead Peasanst" referred to dead employees. Myers made that part up. Since I wrote one of those memos, I'm pretty sure about the allusion. Of course, I could be lying, but why bother? (I didn't even know this stuff was called "Dead Peasants Insurance" until I saw it on CSI: Miami. You can find more at http://tinyurl.com/yld2sfc
Posted by roxy collins on 2010-01-15 19:42:40
so let me see if i understand... these major corporations buy life insurance policies on their employees... if or when the employee passes, the money that the corporation gets goes back to the insurance company to pay for future premiums, right?

it seems as though the companies r still benefiting from the employee deaths, because the money buys them more life insurance policies. the same life insurance policies that are getting them more tax breaks! even if they are REQUIRED to use the money for more policies, it still seems like an equally great deal for corporations whether the employee is dead or alive...

let's say i take a life insurance policy out on my massage therapist... i get back rubs and tax breaks all at the same time... if my massage therapist dies, the money just goes towards buying another life insurance policy on a new massage therapist or maybe a massage therapist AND a manicurist... so, yeah, i'd be forced to use the money for new premiums, but the situation is still win/win for me
Posted by Anonymous on 2010-02-27 16:03:15
http://library.findlaw.com/2004/Dec/23/147942.html
Posted by Lawrence Jay Kramer on 2010-03-30 13:49:54
"So let me see if I understand..."

Well, you don't. All of the profit in this game derived from tax loopholes. The tax loopholes persisted while the employees lived. The premiums were adjusted periodically so that neither the insurance company nor the employer made any money on the insurance.

For a company to make money overall on employees' deaths, an insurance company would have to LOSE money overall on them. On what planet does the house lose that bet?

No, as much fun as it would be to think the companies were exploiting the little folk, it was all about taxes, and when the government shut that loophole in 1997, it all went away.
Walmart
Posted by Thomas Rockford on 2014-01-27 21:43:30
Walmart should serve as an example to All Americans of what is so terribly wrong with Corporate control of our legislators, and why after over 25 years of the destructive charade that is Voodoo trickle down economics we have more people living in poverty in America than any other industrialized nation in the world .
How many more billions do the Walton clan need to make before they pay a living wage and offer health care benefits to those who work for them?
Are these the Christian values I hear so much about, Exploit the vulnerable and profit from their suffering?
Just six members of Walmart's Walton clan are worth as much as the bottom 30 percent of all Americans.
The Republican Economic model for America will continue to force more and more of our citizens into poverty while the select few will continue their extraction of wealth from your pockets to theirs.
The cheap goods purchased at your local Walmart come with a terrible and expensive cost to our society.
Stop the charade.
Register and Vote make your voices herd.
- Tom from http://www.lifeant.com
Posted by Tammy on 2016-01-10 01:23:43
My husband worked for wal Mart distribution center at the time of his death. How do I find out if they had a policy for him at that time? He passed in 2003.
 

Comments

 
Name: (change name for anonymous posting)
Title:
Comments:
   

1 Article displayed.

Pursuant to Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code (47 USC § 230), BSAlert is a user-contributed editorial web site and does not endorse any specific content, but merely acts as a "sounding board" for the online community. Any and all quoted material is referenced pursuant to "Fair Use" (17 U.S.C. § 107). Like any information resource, use your own judgement and seek out the facts and research and make informed choices.

Powered by Percleus (c) 2005-2047 - Content Management System

[Percleus 0.9.4] (c) 2005, PCS